NFL Point Spread Standings - Up to Week 7
Not surprisingly, Tennessee has been shocking everyone including bettors. After Vince Young left, nobody thought they would be 6-0 and less so 6-0 ATS this year. Has everyone caught up on this? Is the spread going to over react to them now? I do not think so only because they lack star power. I see the spread under-estimating this team throughout the year, including the coming week against the Colts at home.
I just wanted to put this up there. These numbers do not mean much (to me). If anything, I would be cautious of teams that have a very bad and very good record because the market will start adjusting on the other side. It is interesting to see so far which teams have been over-rated: CIN, DAL, MIN, SF, and DEN and which teams have been under-rated: TEN, TB, ARI, ATL, BAL, BUF. Look at my previous post to see how these teams performed against the point spread in previous years and see if you find any significant trends, if you do let me know.
I just wanted to put this up there. These numbers do not mean much (to me). If anything, I would be cautious of teams that have a very bad and very good record because the market will start adjusting on the other side. It is interesting to see so far which teams have been over-rated: CIN, DAL, MIN, SF, and DEN and which teams have been under-rated: TEN, TB, ARI, ATL, BAL, BUF. Look at my previous post to see how these teams performed against the point spread in previous years and see if you find any significant trends, if you do let me know.
| 2008 NFL Records vs. Point Spread |
| Team | W | L | T | PCT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TENNESSEE | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| TAMPA BAY | 5 | 2 | 0 | 71.4% |
| ARIZONA | 4 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| ATLANTA | 4 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| BALTIMORE | 4 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| BUFFALO | 4 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| CAROLINA | 4 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% |
| CHICAGO | 4 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% |
| CLEVELAND | 4 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| NY GIANTS | 4 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| PHILADELPHIA | 4 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| GREEN BAY | 4 | 3 | 0 | 57.1% |
| NEW RLEANS | 4 | 3 | 0 | 57.1% |
| SAN DIEGO | 4 | 3 | 0 | 57.1% |
| WASHINGTON | 4 | 3 | 0 | 57.1% |
| MIAMI | 3 | 3 | 0 | 50.0% |
| NEW ENGLAND | 3 | 3 | 0 | 50.0% |
| NY JETS | 3 | 3 | 0 | 50.0% |
| OAKLAND | 3 | 3 | 0 | 50.0% |
| PITTSBURGH | 3 | 3 | 0 | 50.0% |
| DETROIT | 2 | 4 | 0 | 33.3% |
| HOUSTON | 2 | 4 | 0 | 33.3% |
| INDIANAPOLIS | 2 | 4 | 0 | 33.3% |
| JACKSONVILLE | 2 | 4 | 0 | 33.3% |
| KANSAS ITY | 2 | 4 | 0 | 33.3% |
| SEATTLE | 2 | 4 | 0 | 33.3% |
| ST LOUIS | 2 | 4 | 0 | 33.3% |
| CINCINNATI | 2 | 5 | 0 | 28.6% |
| DALLAS | 2 | 5 | 0 | 28.6% |
| MINNESOTA | 2 | 5 | 0 | 28.6% |
| SAN FRANCISCO | 2 | 5 | 0 | 28.6% |
| DENVER | 1 | 6 | 0 | 14.3% |
Comments